I knew something was fishy with Macklemore ever since he started dropping music with Ryan Lewis. None of what was being released seemed to be genuine. To me at least. Instead, it looked like Macklemore was just picking random causes to rap about, while Ryan Lewis created an epic-sounding beat to go with it. And then they made an incredibly well-produced video to go along with.
Anyway, what I am trying to say here is that Macklemore’s music didn’t seem to be anything more than a good business plan. And now as his song “Thrift Shop” tops the chart, we can’t help but debate his rise to stardom. And I don’t care about people selling out. Artists do things in order to make money all the time. But there is something so off about the way Macklemore is doing it.
With that said, Macklemore has been getting a lot of heat in general. But he decided to only address the recent buzz surrounding his appearance in the 2013 NBA All Star game. His song “Wings”, which is about consumerism by the way, was used as a theme song for the event. Apparently bloggers and Twitter fiends have been talking shit about it. In turn, it looks like he felt the need to defend himself against the critics. Here is what he had to say: [via Easy-Mack]
Over the past couple days, I’ve read numerous tweets and a couple articles about the use of our song “Wings” as the intro for the 2013 NBA All Star Game. While most people were congratulatory over the television appearance, it seemed like there were a fair amount of people that were quick to throw out the good, old-fashioned “sellout” statement. The bigger our profile gets, the more I’m getting use to the phrase and the “purists” who toss it around so liberally. But I figured I should probably break it down from my perspective to let you know where I stand.
The song “Wings” is about the pursuit of identity through the means of consumerism. The attempt is to dissect our infatuation and attachment to logos, labels, brands and the fleeting happiness that is intrinsically linked to the almighty power of the purchase. The subject I use in the song is shoes, but its aim is to paint a broader picture of being a consumer and tracing the lineage back to my first memory of retail infused desire.
I love the NBA. Always have, ever since I was a little kid. When we got offered the TNT All Star game intro it was a no-brainer. I showed up that day to a middle school gym in LA and as I was reading the script I was informed that they re-arranged the structure of the song. I didn’t know prior to that day that my lyrics were going to be edited. But to be 100% honest with you, I didn’t really care once I learned that they were. The only thing that I was a little “ehhhh” about was the last bar. But I put it on the ethics scale, and the last bar alteration wasn’t outweighing the potential reach that I saw in doing the video.
In any licensing deal they are going to edit your music. A 4 minute song does not fit into a 30 second movie trailer. Lyrics have to get cut in order for the trailer/ad to make sense with what the company is promoting. And a song about consumerism doesn’t fit into an NBA All Star Game intro without some tailoring. There is a story telling aspect of Wings that chronicles loving basketball, being a kid and wanting to be like Jordan. That’s the side that the NBA wanted to use. Makes sense. Probably doesn’t make sense for them to use the part that’s breaking down our obsession with the shoes that 90% of the players in the NBA wear, right?
The All Star game intro was seen by millions of people on Sunday who had no idea who we were. My thinking was, if they liked the song they will go and listen to the full version. Those who hear the original song in its entirety will get the core of what gives the song depth. Some might even buy it and become real fans. And guess what version they get? Not the TNT chopped up edit, but the full one.
In my stripped down definition, selling out is compromising your artistic integrity for money/fame. In my heart I can tell you that my personal artistic integrity remained completely intact over the weekend. TNT used our song. They’re still my words. They picked the parts that fit their ad campaign, and visually matched it to us performing, threw in a highlight reel of crazy dunks and had a bunch of kids singing the hook in a gym. Word. I’m all for that. If you take away the consumerism cautionary core of Wings, a story still remains. And that story is one that I’m still proud of, and it’s dope to me that it’s relatable enough for TNT to want to use it.
I would understand the “Macklemore sold out” complaints more if we matched Wings to a shoe commercial. That would be blatant irony, it would completely contradict the song and would appear as a sell out move. But an NBA commercial? The NBA has very little to do with what Wings was really about. The songs subject is about shoes, but the guts of the record are about consumer culture. Is the NBA tied up in this culture and related in some way? Of course. All companies selling a product are. But this is the result of American culture. Does the NBA happen to fall under the capitalist umbrella? Absolutely. But it’s no different than the brands you’re currently wearing, the company that manufactured the couch that you’re sitting on or the computer/phone you’re staring into while reading this.
If there was any trace of irony by Wings being one of the official songs of the 2013 All Star Game, that’s great. That means that we won. The song about consumerism was embraced on a national level, and played to the entire country of sports fans that tuned in. More people download the song, got the truth (the actual/full song) and we converted strangers that didn’t know who we were into fans. If that’s selling out to you, word. But to me that’s nothing but an all around win.
Let us know what you think about Macklemore’s statement in the comments section below. Personally, I wish that Macklemore would address all the other issues the Internet seems to be having with him at this time.

fuck this guy. talking about how foolish peoples’ attachment to logos and labels are… thats all this fucking guy is about. look at the shit he wears he aint goin to no thrift store.
support mackelmoe?Q??!?!2
Couldn’t have put it better. Either this blog or another put me onto Mack long before Thrift Shop got big… and I put his music back down, long before Thrift Shop got big.
i stopped reading after he said ‘intrinsically’
classic trying to sound smart word
Pretty much.
I don’t think he’s a sell out. I just think he getting played out.
People said the same things about Saul Williams and his Nike commercial a few years ago. That’s not to say that Mack is even in the same stratosphere as Saul, but are we going to start holding every semi-“conscious” rapper to the Sage Francis standard?
I kind of like Macklemore. Never was a big fan but when this album first drop i liked a few joints. I guess i dont give a fuck since I don’t listen to radio or watch much tv to care about macklemore rise to fame. but i always assumed it was a good thing. he reminds me of Slug, but that is irrelevant. but i tend to favor artists who stay independent, which really is a huge accomplishment when you become as successful as he is. however, “sell-out”, idk i mean if I did not already suspect people did not like him for some other reason other than Wings thing, i would give attention. however, i advocate for his defense that he is far from the first who did something like that. I mean almost every famous song about some cause has been used in some commercial or ironic way, despite the content.
Sorry?
I also met him once and he choked me with a “Thrift Shop” single
He paid ADA a fuck ton of money to get his music number one on Billboard thus initiating the snowball effect. Yeah.
It’s funny because he, just like a lot of other people know exactly what they’re doing
I just don’t like dude’s music, meaning I don’t really give a shit about any of this.
lolwut
If you subscribe to the idea of “selling out”, his description of stripping down his message to reach a wider audience, especially for an industry that could not be more hand and hand with the shoes industry, is kinda the definition of the phrase. I’m not personally offended by it, and it was probably a really smart career move for him, and I’m sure it won’t affect the types of messages he’ll try to bring about in songs in the future. But his response didn’t really dissuade the critique.
i am a little discomforted with the use of wings in the commercial
i wouldnt be so quick to call it a sell out, however…
he hasnt changed his music. it still conveys a socially positive message which is something seldom found in top 40 hip hop these days
but the NBA is a market full of corporate endorsements, and the tone of wings is like a black sheep among the billion dollar brands
i cant blame the guy
as an up and coming hip hop artist, exposure as big as this is invaluable
if people are interested in his music, which they might be after they hear the ad, they will be quick to learn that Macklemore’s intentions are not to ‘sell out’
yes he is the one physically shoving it down the radio stations throats… FOH… number one on billboard… its gonna be on radio and he is gonna be asked to guest spot on TV… Hard worked paid off and he is reaping the benefits. You wouldn’t do the same?
I never really took the song “Wings” seriously considering this dude wears a different pair of Jordans everywhere he goes.
I kind of like this blog. I’m mostly indifferent towards Macklemore. This article is changing my opinion on both.
That response was one big “hey I want to be popular, fuck it”
I am not a huge fan of the guy, but if he’s “selling out”, which I think is a stupid phrase that got played out in the mid 90’s, at least he’s making songs about things. Things that most of hip-hop and damn near all top 40 hip-hop won’t touch. I think his voice provides a welcome balance to the rap on the radio. Now I can hear, all I want for my birthday is big booty ho, followed by a song about materialism in the span of 10 minutes. Win.
Doesn’t address the fact that he’s shoving Thrift Shop down everyone’s throats through the same means that, hmmm, a Maroon 5 would use.
Well thought out and I can’t really argue with his logic as it’s a business. ‘Sell Out’ doesn’t fit with him particularly well, but either does ‘genuine’ when it comes to hip-hop in general. At the same time he’s not really doing satirical rap either, so basically props to him for working with Ryan Lewis and I’ll be patiently waiting for him to license “thrift shop” to a national campaign for Salvo.
it was pointless. he shouldnt have even responded. and the response seems dumbed down. but who cares!?
Good for him. It was a well thought out and honest response. But in actuality all any artist should say is, “It’s my music and I can do what I want with it, and I don’t owe you an explanation or a damn thing.”
The term “purist” is reserved for people who sit around and complain about something not being how it once was or the way they want it to be. I should know. I am one.